Entrepreneurship, religion and democracy
Agribusiness and Politics
Evangelical Women and Democracy
Working Hours, Economic Growth and Well-Being
Oil and the Energy Transition
Transportation and Delivery Platforms
Public Security and Democracy
Regulation of Social Media Platforms and the Marco Civil da Internet
Freedom of expression and action of the Judiciary
Sustainable Agribusiness
Deforestation in the Cerrado
BRICS and the new multipolar global order
Artificial Intelligence and the Environment
The Brazilian political system and the quality of democracy
Environment and Development
Digitalisation and the job market
The relationship between State and religion
Artificial Intelligence, Democracy and Public PolicyFreedom of expression and action of the Judiciary
Ponto a Ponto is a series of videos featuring an evidence-based dialogue between two leading figures in their fields, with the aim of finding a common and viable path between their points of view.
In the third episode of the series, Clarissa Gross and Pierpaolo Bottini discuss the limits of freedom of expression in cases of anti-democratic speech. They also discuss the role of the judiciary in judging such speech.
Pierpaolo Bottini: ‘Even as a society, we have a certain difficulty in understanding to what extent we accept freedom of expression or not’.
Clarissa Gross: ‘People have few conditions to orient themselves in each of the expressive contexts about the limits of what they can or cannot say in the end’.
Freedom of expression and action of the Judiciary
Experts on this episode: Clarissa Gross, professor at the FGV Direito SP, and Pierpaolo Bottini, professor at the Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo.